Home > LearnHigher Stories > Archive and reports

Archive and Reports

LearnHigher undertakes practice-led enquiry to build a research base that informs the effective use of resources. We wish to learn what works for whom, in what contexts.

We are also engaged in evaluation; not only of the processes we engage in as a CETL but of the effects that our activities have on the student experience

LearnHigher adopted an externally mediated critical self-evaluation approach to its evaluation effort. From its inception, the CETL worked with Professor Peter Knight as external evaluator to embed its evaluative processes within the daily work of the network members. From 2007, Professor Paul Trowler acted as external evaluator and critical friend. If you are interested in the bid for the CETL or the evaluation reports, please browse the documents below for further information.

Year 1 Evaluation

This document summarises LearnHigher’s achievements in the first year of the CETL and concludes that there was an impressive level of activity with good value for money. It argues that LearnHigher’s potential is related to its success in brokering an agreed operational account of ‘learning development’ and outlines LearnHigher’s capability to make a significant contribution to the quality of teaching and learning in England.

Year 2 Evaluation

The report defines LearnHigher as a collaborative network striving for excellence in its approach to learning development, whose collective influence has been far greater than its individual partners carried on their own. It notes that the LearnHigher-funded student learning spaces at partner institutions had increased the influence of Learning Area Coordinators. A successful symposium also demonstrated a growth in capacity and endeavour.

Year 3 Evaluation

This document recognises the obvious synergy between partners, suggesting that this could increase output exponentially. Continued positive effects on student learning and greater integration of learning development with other activities were observed, along with some impact on university strategy and structures. It perceives the next challenge for the project to be the broadening of the effects of LearnHigher’s work with external staff and institutions.

Year 4 Evaluation

The report notes a range of outputs including the further development of successful initiatives such as the Maths Café and large-scale resources such as WrAssE (Writing for Assignments Electronic-Library). The launch of the updated LearnHigher website is also discussed. It commends the development of a strong and effective community of practice amongst LearnHigher partners.

Year 5 Evaluation

This is a substantial final report which provides an evaluative reflection of the overall impact and effectiveness of LearnHigher over the life of the CETL. It concludes that LearnHigher fully achieved the aims and objectives set out at the beginning of the project, largely due to a well conceived plan and highly collaborative team of staff. The report includes a list of peer-reviewed outputs, examples of spin-out projects and events and considers how the work and achievements of the CETL will continue after the project end.