Top 10 tips on Deterring Plagiarism

Use the information in this guide to deter plagiarism in your assessment. For further
reading and case study details, go to https://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai/staff/index.html.

1. Explain the benefits of and reasons for correct referencing

(see https://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai/staff/deterringplagiarism/deterringplagiarism1.html)
Students should not believe that correct referencing is only required to avoid accusations of plagiarism. Emphasise:

• academic integrity and the student’s membership of the academic community plus the effect on the value of their degrees if plagiarism is accepted practice.
• the link between good academic practice and better grades rather than penalties.

2. Promote student engagement

Activities to promote academic integrity and student engagement:

• explicitly include academic skills and referencing in assessment criteria (see Top ten tips on assessment for learning)
• include students in assessment design where practicable (see Top ten tips on self, peer and group assessment)
• encourage students to become involved in departmental discussions on plagiarism
• provide examples of good academic writing at a suitable level from your discipline.

3. Make sure your students understand what constitutes plagiarism in your assignment, subject or course

(see https://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai/staff/deterringplagiarism/deterringplagiarism2.html)

• give students very clear assignment instructions
• clarify the distinction between collaboration and collusion as some students find this confusing
• identify what may constitute ‘general knowledge’ and not need referencing
• give examples of the type of citations and sources you expect students to use

Further activities on raising student awareness of plagiarism can be found on the University of Kent’s Academic Integrity website.

5. Make sure your students are aware of the consequences of plagiarising

6. Understand why your students may cheat so you can remove this incentive

(see https://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai/staff/deterringplagiarism/deterringplagiarism4.html)
Reasons for cheating include:

• running out of time and being unable to cope with the work
• pressure to succeed and perceived lack of interest from lecturers
• unable to reference and wanting to pass not learn
• because it is so easy! Reusing tasks that rely on simple tasks invites cheating.

5. Design your course and assessment tasks to promote learning and to make
plagiarism difficult and less rewarding for students

(see https://www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai/staff/deterringplagiarism/deterringplagiarism5.html)
Design engaging assessment tasks (See Top ten tips on diversifying assessment):

• Students value assessments which appear to have some meaning or relevance outside of academia (See Report on Students’ Views of Assessment, UELT 2005).

Carroll (2007) suggests:

• give students clear instructions and narrow task requirements
• include random vivas or supervised ‘meta-tasks’ eg: ‘I learned…’
• ask for lists of sources or reflections on the task
• include peer review (see Top ten tips on self, peer and group assessment)

Tips on course design (adapted from Carroll & Appleton, 2001)

6. Rewrite your assessment tasks for each time the course is taught

Reusing tasks invites copying of previous work. Include current information and personal reflection where possible as this is not so easily downloaded from the Internet and invites student engagement.

7. Include ‘process’ in the assessment as well as analysis, evaluation and
synthesis

Check the steps in the assessment process i.e. check drafts or interim work (which may or may not be not assessed).

8. Avoid information gathering tasks

Include an aspect of manipulating information to prevent students simply gathering and reporting facts.

9. Individualise tasks and create tasks which may have multiple solutions

In certain subjects it may be useful to give students the same task but with differing data sets.

10. Integrate tasks so that student build on previous achievements

This both makes the individual tasks useful and relevant, and prevents students from simply jumping to the final task and attempting to short-cut the learning involved.

References and further reading

• Carroll, J. (2007) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education 2nd edition,Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
• Carroll, J. & Appleton, J. (2001) Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide [online] JISC.
• Chester, G. (2001) Plagiarism Detection and Prevention: Final Report on the JISC Electronic Plagiarism Detection Project, JISC.
• UELT (2005) Report on students’ views on assessment, University of Kent: .